Trepitja Garrotxa in 2026: date, distances and trails in Oix

Plan your race pace

The 2026 edition of Trepitja Garrotxa Solidària is scheduled for October 24 in Montagut i Oix, in the province of Girona. The event offers five distances—9, 13, 23, 53 and 84 kilometers—with Oix as its main hub and the paths of the Alta Garrotxa providing the setting. Its range extends from shorter mountain routes to two ultradistance races.

The date is settled, but not every practical detail is equally certain. The available information does not yet establish the entry fee, start times, cutoff times or full participation requirements. Elevation figures published in race calendars help indicate the scale of the challenge, although they should be checked against this edition’s final rules and routes.

The event is presented as the 12th Trepitja Garrotxa Solidària and is associated with the Centre Excursionista d’Olot. That identity matters as much as the distances: this is not simply about covering kilometers, but about taking part in a race that combines sport, an appreciation of the landscape and a charitable history. The surroundings shape the experience from the first trail, on terrain where progress requires more than holding a steady pace.

Oix is part of the municipality of Montagut i Oix. The distinction is useful when looking for accommodation, planning a journey or interpreting an entry listing, as some calendars use the village name and others the municipality. The geographical setting is the Alta Garrotxa, north of the wider Garrotxa district in Girona, an area of rugged terrain that should not be confused with urban courses or races on consistently smooth tracks.

Garrotxa is often associated with its volcanoes, but that image alone does not describe this race’s landscape. In the Alta Garrotxa, limestone formations, ravines, woodland and steep hillsides take center stage. This mountainous character provides a more useful explanation of the event’s demands than a general reference to the district’s volcanic scenery, particularly when assessing the longer distances.

The five routes are not interchangeable versions of the same difficulty. Distance provides an initial measure of the effort; elevation gain, sustained climbs and ground conditions complete the picture. A short race can pack in demanding slopes, while an ultra adds cumulative fatigue and many hours of decision-making. Here, distance and climbing need to be considered together to avoid misleading comparisons with road running.

The 9-kilometer option is listed with approximately 300 meters of elevation gain and a single-loop course. It is the shortest announced route, but it is not equivalent to running nine flat kilometers. Its shorter format reduces the total distance without removing the demands of the terrain. Climbs may require walking, and descents call for attention, particularly for runners arriving from road races.

The 13-kilometer Cursa Petita is listed with 550 meters of cumulative climbing. Compared with the 9-kilometer option, that means four additional kilometers and 250 more meters of ascent, according to the published figures. The increase brings more time in the mountains and greater muscular demands, although the actual difficulty will also depend on how those climbs are distributed and the characteristics of the final route.

The 23-kilometer Cursa raises the published elevation gain to 1,200 meters. Its distance is 1.9 kilometers longer than a 21.1-kilometer half-marathon, but the decisive difference is the terrain. Comparing it with a road half-marathon solely by length overlooks the cost of climbing and descending. It is a mountain endurance race, rather than a road half-marathon transplanted into the woods.

On this intermediate route, fatigue can develop differently from what a city runner is used to. Heart rate rises on climbs, foot placement changes on uneven ground, and the legs take considerable strain on descents. A recent 10K or half-marathon time therefore cannot reliably predict a result. Experience on trails is a more useful reference than a personal best from a flat course.

The 53-kilometer trail race is listed with 2,840 meters of elevation gain in the calendar covering all five distances. Its length exceeds the 42.195 kilometers of a marathon, placing it in the ultradistance category. The combination means sustained exertion, eating during the race and maintaining effective forward progress when running is no longer the most efficient choice on steep slopes.

There is a significant discrepancy in the published information for the 53-kilometer race: another listing gives it 990 meters of climbing. The difference is 1,850 meters, far too large to dismiss as a minor detail. It would be unwise to build an effort estimate around the more favorable figure. The final elevation gain should come from the route and the organizer’s documentation, not from combining information across directories.

The 84-kilometer ultra is the longest option, with 4,700 meters of climbing in the general information for this edition. Using those figures as a reference, it adds 31 kilometers and 1,860 meters of ascent to the 53-kilometer race. That increase in demands affects duration, muscular fatigue and the margin needed to deal with fueling, equipment or adjustments to the terrain.

A federation listing from 2019 records 84 kilometers and 4,750 meters of climbing, but it describes an earlier edition. The 50-meter difference from the 4,700 meters currently published may seem small; the important point is not to mix up years. Routes can change, and measurements do not always match. The 2019 documentation provides historical context but does not replace the participation conditions or course profile for 2026.

The figures reveal another useful detail. The announced routes average approximately 33 meters of climbing per kilometer for the 9-kilometer race, 42 for the 13, 52 for the 23, 54 for the 53 and 56 for the 84. These are indicative ratios, not average gradients. This concentration of climbing shows that the longer options add mountain effort as well as distance, without revealing where the steepest sections fall.

Elevation gain adds up every meter climbed; it does not represent the finish-line altitude or the net difference between start and finish. A route returning to its starting point can involve substantial climbing even though both locations have the same elevation. Descents are not automatic recovery, either. The strain of descending can punish the thighs and demand concentration when fatigue makes foot placement less precise.

There is not enough detailed information to describe specific mountain passes, the position of each aid station or the proportions of singletrack and wider paths. Presenting a fixed itinerary without those details would create a false sense of certainty. What is established is the event’s mountain trail character, using paths and trails in the Alta Garrotxa; the precise arrangement of sections belongs in this edition’s map and route file.

The confirmed October 24 date resolves the ambiguity of some calendars, which place the event broadly in mid-October. Another listing dates the 53-kilometer race to October 15. For this edition, the supplied date is Saturday, October 24, although that does not automatically establish a shared start time for all distances or mean that the full program has been finalized.

Confirmation of the day does not mean registration has opened. No verifiable entry fee, entry deadline or confirmed capacity is available. It is therefore not possible to say that a particular distance is available or sold out, or to build a participation budget using previous years’ prices. The registration status requires a specific announcement, separate from confirmation of the date.

The overall cost of attending may include travel, accommodation and meals as well as the race entry, but those items depend on the runner’s starting point and length of stay. Without a published race fee, giving a total would be speculative. Possible federation discounts or surcharges are not confirmed here, either. A price comparison would only be meaningful with 2026 figures and clearly identified included services.

The general information mentions bib collection on preceding days, an equipment check for the ultra, race regulations and event tracking. These are useful indications of how the event operates, but they do not establish venues or times. A runner traveling from farther away needs that information before finalizing a trip. Bib collection can influence arrival plans just as much as the start time itself.

Aid stations are also announced along the route, but there is no confirmed list of their locations, spacing or available supplies. That gap matters particularly for the two ultras: frequent opportunities to restock are very different from a long stretch without replenishment. Self-sufficiency between checkpoints should be assessed using the regulations and conditions on the day, rather than assuming that all events provide a similar arrangement.

Mandatory equipment belongs to the same group of details awaiting clarification. Mention of an ultra equipment check does not establish what water capacity, warm clothing, lighting or emergency items will be required in 2026. Those requirements depend on the route and regulations. The required equipment should not be reconstructed from general recommendations or lists belonging to other races.

The 2019 federation listing required a specific medical certificate for participation in the 84-kilometer ultra. That historical requirement cannot automatically be applied to the current event. It remains unclear whether it still applies, which document is accepted and how it must be submitted. The applicability of requirements depends on the edition: an earlier obligation deserves attention but is not, by itself, a current instruction for runners.

A similar distinction applies to international references. The general calendar identifies the 53- and 84-kilometer distances as UTMB Index races, while the 2019 documentation referred to four ITRA points linked to the system used at that time. These concepts belong to different contexts. The UTMB Index designation does not guarantee a place in another race and should not be confused with the historical points described in an older listing.

The charitable dimension is part of the event’s documented identity. Federation information links its organization to the Centre Excursionista d’Olot and its proceeds to the Fundació Albert Bosch, which supports pediatric medical research projects. This historical charitable connection helps explain the event’s name. However, no fundraising total or financial allocation for 2026 is available that can be treated as confirmed.

Charitable aims do not reduce the sporting demands. Taking a bib still means tackling the chosen route, meeting its conditions and arriving with appropriate preparation. Nor can the share of each entry fee going to a beneficiary be inferred without specific financial information. The social purpose adds another dimension to the event, but it should be described without turning a documented history into promises about unpublished amounts.

For runners coming from the roads, the most important adjustment is learning to change speed without treating every walking step as a failure. On steep slopes, purposeful walking can be more sustainable than insisting on running. Mountains interrupt a steady pace and require runners to read the terrain. This management of effort becomes particularly important as distance increases and the room for recovery narrows.

Specific preparation generally includes gradual exposure to climbs, descents and uneven surfaces, alongside overall endurance. Simply accumulating flat kilometers does not reproduce the experience of a trail. Strength work and downhill practice can help runners tolerate the load, provided they suit the individual’s experience. Adaptation to the terrain takes time and cannot be achieved through a single long outing just before race day.

In October, equipment and strategy also depend on the actual weather, not just the season. Rain can make some surfaces slippery, while changes in temperature between exertion, shade and stops affect how cold runners feel. No reliable forecast can be included this far in advance. Conditions on the day will be more useful than any general description of autumn when deciding how to approach the event.

Fueling and hydration become more important as time on the move increases. Over longer distances, waiting until feeling depleted can make it harder to sustain effort; trying unfamiliar products can also cause digestive discomfort. Needs vary between runners and between days. Tolerance established in training is more useful than copying someone else’s quantities without considering intensity, duration, temperature and the actual opportunities to replenish supplies.

Footwear deserves an equally specific assessment. Grip and stability on uneven ground matter more here than the responsiveness of a fast shoe on a straight stretch of asphalt. Without knowing the final ground conditions, no single tread pattern can be prescribed. The sensible priorities are traction and fit for mountain running, using shoes already worn in training and suitable for the expected number of hours.

For a runner traveling from the Valencian Community, the journey adds a factor that does not appear on the elevation profile. Reaching Oix means coordinating transport, rest and bib collection, especially if arrangements require arriving the previous day. There is no confirmed information about event buses, reserved parking or shuttles. Travel to Oix should be planned without assuming the existence of services the event information does not yet describe.

Choosing accommodation cannot be reduced to presumed proximity to the start: the exact start and finish location is not included in the available information. Staying in the village or another town has different implications for race morning. Estimating access times requires the final location and travel instructions. Arrival logistics may change when the operational program is published.

Supporters need the same information to plan their day. Without expected passing times, authorized viewing areas or described access routes, recommending specific places to watch would be irresponsible. In mountainous terrain, apparent proximity on a map does not guarantee easy access. Spectating along the course should follow the organizer’s instructions and avoid interfering with runners, residents or shared-use paths.

The relationship with the landscape is also part of the experience. Staying on the marked route, carrying litter to a suitable disposal point and avoiding shortcuts reduce impacts that may seem small individually but accumulate as participants pass through. Respect for the surroundings is not a decorative extra: in a race built around paths and woodland, the landscape is an essential part of what runners have come to explore.

Results for the 2026 edition cannot be treated as available before the event takes place. There is no classification from which to name winners, times or finisher numbers. Once results are published, comparisons will need to distinguish the race category, actual distance and any course changes. Comparisons between editions will only be fair if those differences are considered alongside the weather and conditions in which each race took place.

For now, the event has a clear foundation: Oix, October 24, five distances and a mountain-running identity with a charitable background. The details that turn a calendar date into a fully defined participation plan still need to be settled. Choosing between 9 and 84 kilometers is not about finding the most ambitious bib, but the route that fits the runner’s experience. A manageable distance is one that allows the mountains to be approached with sound judgment, not merely a finish line to be crossed.

You may also like: XXV Marxa Solidària de Muntanya al Garbí 2026: route and details and Trencacims in Paüls 2027: trail race dates and distances.