Races
Los Ángeles de San Rafael open-water swim 2027: key details
Two distances, entry from €16 and several details to clarify before swimming in Segovia.

The Los Ángeles de San Rafael swimming event has a confirmed date of August 15, 2027, at the Outdoor Factory facilities in El Espinar, a municipality in Spain’s Segovia province. The announcement offers two distances, 750 and 2,500 meters, with published entry fees starting at €16 and €21, respectively. The sporting program takes place in the morning, with race number collection from 8 a.m. and an awards ceremony scheduled for 11:30 a.m.
One important correction concerns the name: the eighth edition took place in 2025, while the 2027 announcement identifies the event as the 10th Travesía a Nado ASR. Some published start times also conflict. The detailed program schedules the short swim for 9:30 a.m. and the long swim for 10 a.m., although another announcement puts the first start at 9 a.m. The date is confirmed; that timing discrepancy needs clarification before planning arrival.
The calendar resolves another contradiction without speculation: August 15, 2027, falls on a Sunday, not a Friday as one promotional text states. These overlapping references illustrate why it matters to identify the correct edition before relying on an older listing. A result from 2025, registration information from another season or a timetable left on a webpage may describe the same event, but not necessarily the same staging of it.
The announced venue is Outdoor Factory in Los Ángeles de San Rafael, part of El Espinar in Segovia province. The available description places the activity in a reservoir beside the facilities. This is neither a running race nor a triathlon: it is an open-water swimming event, with no cycling or running segment announced. For runners who combine sports, that distinction changes both preparation and expectations about the effort involved.
The 750-meter and 2,500-meter swims demand different levels of commitment despite sharing the same setting. The longer option is more than three times the distance of the shorter one; holding the same pace for a few extra minutes is not the whole story. Swimming-specific endurance, navigation and maintaining an effective stroke become increasingly important as the swim continues. Good aerobic fitness from running helps, but it does not replace technical competence in the water.
The supplied information does not include a detailed map showing every buoy, turning point or exact lap layout. That prevents an accurate route description or any assurance that the course matches previous editions. In a reservoir, the shortest line is not always obvious from the water: glare, other swimmers and the position of landmarks affect navigation along the course, even when the distance itself seems manageable.
The program schedules race number collection from 8 to 9:15 a.m. in the start area. The short-distance swimmers are also called at 9:15 a.m., ahead of the detailed program’s 9:30 a.m. start. Having collection close as the pre-start check begins leaves little room for delays: arriving at the end of that window could complicate picking up equipment and hearing the instructions delivered before the event begins.
For the long swim, participants are called at 9:45 a.m., with the start at 10 a.m. The timetable includes a first-lap checkpoint at 10:25 a.m. and awards at 11:30 a.m. However, the general announcement gives 9 a.m. for the short swim. Until those references are aligned, 9:30 a.m. should be described as the detailed program’s start time, rather than an undisputed fact. The 10 a.m. start for 2,500 meters is consistent across the supplied texts.
The published registration window runs from March 1 through August 14 for the 2027 event. That schedule does not establish that registration is already open in October 2026, nor does it guarantee places will remain until the final day. The available information does not specify a participant cap. It also provides insufficient detail on switching distances, refunds or possible additional processing fees, which are separate matters from the advertised event entry price.
During the first pricing period, March 1 through July 27, the short swim costs €16 and the long swim €21. From July 28 through August 14, those fees rise to €18 and €23. The change adds two euros to either entry, while the difference between the two distances stays at five euros. No specific fee is listed for registering on the day of the event.
Entry is advertised as including a commemorative shirt, a ticket for the club swimming pool, refreshments after the finish, chip timing, and accident and public liability insurance. These are separate benefits: refreshments after the finish do not confirm food or drink support on the course, and pool access does not mean an overnight stay is included. The complete insurance terms are not detailed here either, so coverage or limits absent from the announcement should not be assumed.
The pool ticket may allow participants to spend more time at the facilities, but the supplied information does not explain its hours of use, whether guests are included or any specific restrictions. The same applies to the shirt: it is listed among the included benefits, without a described sizing procedure. Separating what is announced from what remains unspecified prevents an included registration benefit from becoming a broader promise than the event information can support.
The short swim divides categories into ages 8–11, ages 12–14 and an overall category covering ages 15–75. Those ranges show that the 750-meter event brings together very different participant profiles. However, participation by minors is not settled by a published age alone: the supplied material does not explain consent, supervision or documentation. Eligibility within an age category must be distinguished from any administrative and safety requirements set by the applicable regulations.
The 2,500-meter event lists a junior category for ages 15–17 and a senior category for ages 18–29. Masters groups then cover ages 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69 and 70–75. The schedule distinguishes men’s and women’s classifications. It does not specify whether competitive age is determined by birthday or birth year; that method of assigning age categories cannot be inferred from the age ranges alone.
The short swim’s announced awards cover the first three male and female finishers in the 8–11, 12–14 and overall categories. For the long swim, the information mentions the overall winner and the first three in the junior, senior and each masters category. It does not explain whether awards can overlap. There is also an award for the largest club: a cured serrano ham from Cantimpalos. No tie-breaking rules or method for counting club members are provided.
Time limits deserve particular attention because they do not all appear in the main extract. A secondary listing attributes a 25-minute maximum to the short swim and an 85-minute total limit to the long swim, alongside the first-lap checkpoint at 25 minutes. That same listing mentions 2,250 meters in one section, rather than the announcement’s 2,500 meters. The maximum permitted completion times therefore need confirmation in instructions consistent with the final distance.
The difference between 2,250 and 2,500 meters is 250 meters, enough to change effort calculations. If the limits in that listing applied, 750 meters in 25 minutes would mean an average of 3 minutes 20 seconds per 100 meters; 2,500 meters in 85 minutes would mean approximately 3 minutes 24 seconds. These are illustrative calculations, not confirmed requirements. Without knowing the first lap’s length, the pace needed to pass its checkpoint cannot be established either.
Wetsuit use presents a similar verification issue: the secondary listing says wetsuits are prohibited at both distances, but the main extract does not explain that rule. An incomplete reference should not become a guarantee about all permitted equipment. The rules governing swimming equipment need to be clear in the 2027 regulations, including swimwear, caps and accessories. Permission to use a training tow float during the competition cannot be assumed either.
Beyond the regulations, familiar, well-fitting goggles serve a very practical purpose: they allow swimmers to see course references without every leak disrupting breathing. Sunlight on the surface can make the course harder to read, although no lens removes every reflection. The choice depends on conditions and individual comfort. During an open-water event, clear vision for navigation matters more than trying a new accessory or relying entirely on a sports watch.
The shorter distance is not automatically an easy experience for beginners. In a pool, the bottom, lanes and walls organize the space; in open water, those nearby references disappear. Swimming alongside others also brings splashing and possible contact. Familiarity with open water helps swimmers handle that change of setting. Completing 750 meters between lane ropes is a starting point, but it does not by itself establish that every environment will be suitable.
In the longer swim, technique that deteriorates with fatigue can increase the cost of each meter. Holding the head too high, rushed breathing or constant changes of direction reduce efficiency. For a runner, the equivalent would be following a route while making small detours and tensing the body at every step. Here, an efficient swimming stroke plays a decisive role: cardiovascular fitness supplies energy, but how that energy is applied to the water determines the resulting progress.
Swimming can form part of a runner’s cross-training because it develops aerobic capacity without repeating the impact of each footstrike. That benefit does not make a swimming competition a recovery session. Sustained effort still produces fatigue, particularly in the shoulders and trunk muscles. For runners from Valencia or elsewhere, the transfer between the two sports is partial: shared general endurance does not remove the specific demands of swimming, breathing and navigating.
No universal preparation period guarantees completion of this event. An eight- or 12-week proposal might make sense for some swimmers, but presenting it as a recipe for everyone would be misleading. Previous experience, consistency and health all matter. Gradual increases in training load should preserve technique and recovery. Accumulating distance while breathing deteriorates or pain develops does not produce the same adaptation as sustained, well-tolerated training.
Open-water practice requires an authorized location and safe conditions; it should not be undertaken alone. A visible tow float can make a swimmer easier to identify during training, but it does not replace supervision or guarantee rescue. Safety during training sessions also depends on water access, wind, visibility and the ability to get out. Permitted swimming areas and local restrictions matter just as much as the distance planned for a session.
During competition, chest pain, dizziness, severe breathing difficulty or unusual fatigue are not signs to dismiss in pursuit of the finish. The priority is to stop exertion and request assistance using the procedure explained by the safety team. The announcement mentions insurance, but the supplied material does not describe the deployment of boats or personnel. An insurance policy does not replace an operational response to incidents, nor does it establish the availability of resources that have not been detailed.
No water temperature has been confirmed for race day either. An August date is not enough to infer it, and regional climate averages do not describe the exact conditions in a reservoir. Announcing clear skies or a specific temperature this far ahead would create false precision. Weather conditions on the day can only be assessed closer to the event, with particular attention to wind, thunderstorms and instructions from those responsible for safety.
The published location identifies the destination but does not provide a complete access plan. No more detailed postal address, reserved parking, shuttle service or guaranteed journey times are listed. For people traveling from the Valencian Community, transport and rest are part of the logistics, without inventing mileage or travel durations. Arrival at Outdoor Factory should be planned around race number collection, not solely the scheduled time for entering the water.
The complex’s promotional material mentions accommodation, restaurants and other leisure activities, but gives no prices, availability or participant-specific discounts. Those services must be distinguished from what race entry includes. A room, a meal or an additional activity does not appear among the listed sporting benefits. There is also insufficient information about admission or access to particular areas for accompanying guests. Time spent beyond the competition has its own conditions, which cannot be inferred from the swimmer’s pool ticket.
Refreshments are announced after the finish, although their contents are not specified. Replacing fluids according to individual needs, changing out of wet clothing and avoiding prolonged exposure to wind are reasonable general measures, not confirmed event services. For participants who also maintain a running routine, fatigue from travel and swimming counts. The return to running training depends on how the effort was tolerated, rather than treating time in the water as an activity that carries no physical cost.
The announcement provides a useful planning foundation: a confirmed date, two main distances, staged entry fees and a morning program. Its gaps matter too. A detailed course and complete rules on equipment, time limits and paperwork are missing; the short swim’s start time also remains contradictory. The final information for participants needs to resolve those points without mixing references from 2025 with the 2027 event. A lengthy listing is not necessarily a consistent one.
The sporting appeal of Los Ángeles de San Rafael lies in that shift of perspective: leaving the shore behind and moving toward references seen from water level. For a runner, it means competing with a different set of skills; for a swimmer, testing endurance and navigation beyond the pool. The August 15, 2027, event brings those interests together without being a running race. Preparation begins with a correctly identified event announcement and, before the start, requires sufficiently clear distances, times and rules.
You may also like: Aquarun Coslada 2026: date, schedule and distances.

Races2 months agoValencia 2026: dates, registration and 21K guide
Reviews and Comparisons3 months agoAsics Gel-Roadmiles 3 for men: review and current price
Races2 months agoValencia Marathon 2026: entry, ballot and course
Reviews and Comparisons3 months agoAsics Gel Sonoma 8 Gore-Tex: complete analysis for trail and rain
- Sneakers2 months ago
Saucony Endorphin Pro 4: full review and verdict
News4 months agoStrava API 2026: what changes for clubs, challenges and runner apps?
Reviews and Comparisons4 months agoNike Alphafly 3: opinions, sensations, and real key points
Reviews and Comparisons3 months agoNew Balance TWO WXY V5: analysis, price, and performance
Reviews and Comparisons3 months agoUnder Armour running shoes review 2025-2026: models and key features
Sports Equipment3 months agoShoe sizes in cm: a clear guide to getting the right fit for your footwear
- Sneakers2 months ago
Neutral running shoes with lots of cushioning: the best of 2026
News3 months agoWhere is the Hoka brand from and why was it born in France









